Skip to content
Advertisement
banner ads (10)
add a subheading 4

Keeping Time in Oshawa: Six Jeweller and Watchmaker Listings from 1926

by All About Durham Editorial Team in History
Original graphic reading Oshawa 1926, Keeping time, six jeweller and watchmaker listings, beside a symbolic pocket watch.
Original AllAboutDurham symbolic watch graphic; not an archive image or a depiction of a historical product.

November 8, 2026 edition · Historical reference: November 8, 1926 · Sourced archive snapshot. This feature examines an annual directory from 1926. It is not a report from a November 8 newspaper, and the listings do not prove that any particular transaction, repair or opening happened that day.

A familiar object can provide a different route into local history. A watch suggests questions about buying, maintaining and keeping track of things, rather than only about Oshawa’s factories or public buildings. The city’s 1926 directory supplies a modest but concrete starting point: six entries grouped under jewellers and watchmakers.

What makes this list worth reading is its precision. It gives names and addresses, including two street numbers with fractions. It also puts a listing on Elgin West alongside entries on King and Simcoe. Those details offer useful leads for anyone investigating an old receipt, a family business name or an address written on a photograph. They do not require us to invent the appearance of a shop or the work performed inside it.

Six names to begin with

On printed page 249 of Vernon’s City of Oshawa Directory, 1926, the heading “Jewelers and Watchmakers” contains the following entries. Names have been placed in normal reading order and street directions expanded; the address fractions are retained:

  • D. J. Brown: 10 King West.
  • E. Burns: 23½ Simcoe South.
  • A. O. Felt: 22 King East.
  • Felt Bros: 12 Simcoe South.
  • Henry H. Tanton: 116 Elgin West.
  • F. A. Von Gunten: 44½ King West.

This is a count of entries under one combined heading, not a count of independently documented workshops. The directory does not separate the six into jewellers on one side and watchmakers on the other. It would therefore be misleading to assign a distinct specialization to each name, or to describe every address as a watch-repair shop.

Two half numbers that should not disappear

Burns and Von Gunten supply an especially useful lesson in reading old directories. Burns’s address is 23½ Simcoe South, while Von Gunten’s is 44½ King West. The halves are visible on the scan. They are part of the historical addresses, not stray marks to be discarded when transferring the information into a family-history note or a search query.

A transcription that changes 23½ to 23, or 44½ to 44, has removed evidence. Yet keeping the fraction does not tell us what it meant physically at either property. The entries do not specify an upstairs room, a rear entrance, a subdivision or any other arrangement. Those possibilities would need a separate source, such as a plan or an occupancy record, before one could be selected as the explanation.

For a researcher, the practical approach is to preserve the full address first and investigate its meaning second. Search notes can retain both the printed form and a typed equivalent such as “23 1/2,” while clearly identifying them as the same directory entry. That is a more dependable starting point than quietly simplifying an inconvenient number.

King, Simcoe—and Elgin

Three entries use King Street: Brown and Von Gunten are listed on King West, and A. O. Felt on King East. Two use Simcoe South: Burns and Felt Bros. The remaining entry, Henry H. Tanton, gives 116 Elgin West. These totals describe the distribution within this particular list; they are not a survey of every person who might have sold jewellery or worked on a watch in Oshawa.

Tanton’s entry is a reminder not to let the most frequently appearing streets define the whole search. Starting only with King or Simcoe would miss one of the six names under the heading. Equally, the Elgin address alone does not establish whether the premises were exclusively commercial or combined with another use. The directory supplies a location reference, not a description of the building.

We have not verified the modern locations of these addresses. No surviving storefront, current occupant or present-day business succession is asserted here. Matching a 1926 number to a modern map would be a separate research task, requiring checks on numbering and property history.

Names are clues, not complete biographies

The list includes both A. O. Felt and Felt Bros, at different addresses. That shared surname invites a question, but it does not answer it. These entries alone cannot establish a family relationship, common ownership or the movement of a business between premises. They should remain separate research leads until other records connect them.

The same restraint applies to initials. D. J., E., A. O. and F. A. are preserved without supplying unverified given names. Henry H. Tanton’s entry provides a fuller name, but not a life story. A later source with a similar name should be matched using additional details rather than assumed to identify the same person.

A useful next step for someone holding a marked object or dated bill would be to compare the name, address and year together. A matching name might justify another search; a matching address could strengthen that lead. Neither, by itself, would authenticate an object or establish who made it. This directory is a finding aid for that work, not a certificate of provenance.

A small part of the city, carefully recorded

There are no prices, opening hours, inventories or repair charges in these six entries. Nor does the heading tell us which brands were stocked or whether an individual business made, sold or serviced a particular item. The most useful result is simpler: six checkable names, six historical addresses and a record of how the directory grouped them.

That is enough to widen the view of Oshawa’s working life without dressing a reference page up as a daily news story. Readers exploring the broader local past can find more features in our History archive. This edition adds a distinct set of leads: names to search, fractions to preserve and questions that later evidence may answer.

Sources and archive credit

The primary source is Vernon’s City of Oshawa Directory, 1926, published by Henry Vernon & Son. The six listings were visually checked on printed page 249, left column, on the right-hand page of scan leaf 126. The Internet Archive catalogue identifies the scanned original as held in the Local History Room at Oshawa Public Library. For further research, consult Oshawa Public Libraries’ local-history resources.

The newspaper issue run and search index returned access restrictions during this research. We did not bypass them and could not verify an exact-date or nearby issue. That does not establish that no such issue survives. The annual directory supports this labelled archive snapshot, not a claim about events on November 8, 1926.

This is original factual reporting with source links. No archive scan, advertisement or historical photograph is reproduced. The featured image is a newly created symbolic watch graphic, not a historical object or a reconstruction of any listed business’s stock.

Reported by

All About Durham Editorial Team

The All About Durham Editorial Team covers local news, events, public safety, weather and community updates across Durham Region, Ontario.

News from your community

Choose the Durham communities you want to hear about.

Choose your cities
Advertisement
ad1 (1)
Scroll to Top

ALL ABOUT DURHAM

News from your community

Choose your communities. Confirm your email. Stay connected.

Loading the signup form…

Unsubscribe at any time. Your subscription stays pending until you confirm your email.